Grant Review 3
“I struggle with finding time to write my grant proposal while maintaining my clinical practice. My co-investigators are also busy clinician-researchers, and it’s hard to get a thorough review from them on a deadline. Sarah gave me the prompt feedback and big-picture editing I needed, while also keeping me organized and on track. It was so helpful to have a professional from outside of our field and outside of our research group look at the grant with fresh eyes and give constructive criticism. She recommended a major structural revision to my R01 proposal, which I was able to execute within 8 weeks. The end product was vastly improved.”
— PHD, VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY
Grant Review 2
“I found it very helpful to have someone reading the proposal from the angle of “Is this clear? Are the messages consistent?”, etc. I was impressed by your ability to make relevant comments without having training/knowledge in the specific scientific area. From a general grant writing perspective, it also gave me some peace of mind to know that someone was carefully reading.”
— MD, VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY
Grant Review 1
“The feedback I got on my grant was, by far, the most detailed and thoughtful feedback I've seen. I’ve used a bunch of different services to get grant reviews for our faculty. And the feedback they got was pretty crummy. Whereas the review that Sarah’s team did on my grant was very in depth. And it was done in a way where they explained what they were doing and why, which was hugely helpful. I sent my longtime colleague the edited draft, and she said that she’s never seen me write a better grant.”
— PHD, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND